Our relationship to our vehicles may have changed in the past few months with the idea of commuting to work looking more like a shuffle to the desk across the room rather than a drive to the office across town. However, cars have not dropped from their prominence in our society.
With health risks now inherent to ride-sharing and mass transit, people who hadn’t really considered a personal vehicle are rethinking their position. With matters of safety in mind when buying a car, it’s a good time to look at some of the mechanisms that are at the heart of the most recent advancements in vehicular safety systems: sensors.
Sensors are increasingly found all over car bodies. From backup cameras to LIDAR (a light-based radar system and an abbreviation of light detection and ranging) mounted on windshields, cars are decked out from bumper to bumper with technologies that need to “see” what is going on all around the vehicle.
Vehicles equipped with adaptive cruise control systems and other driver-assist or safety features are like self-driving lite. All of these mechanisms have been designed in the constant pursuit of creating a true AUTOmobile.
One of the big reasons we only have these partially autonomous vehicles is because of the reliability factor. For cars to be able to drive themselves, these sensors would have to be perfect. They need to generate a continuous and accurate datastream regarding the constantly changing conditions around the vehicle. The sensors need to maintain the integrity of the AI data by operating consistently, everyday, without fail or deterioration. The ability for the car to self-drive is completely compromised if any one of the sensors is diminished in its data collection capabilities.
Right now, drivers are still able to respond appropriately to alerts regardless of how accurate the alerts are because they can apply their own senses to react to obstructions in the road or adapt their driving to weather conditions. It’s a collaborative effort on the part of the driver and the sensors to create a safe experience. We simply do not trust the integrity of the information the sensors are providing enough to remove human intuition from the equation.
Think how protective we need to be to ensure the longevity of our phones. We can’t leave them outside and expect the lens on the camera to work as well as it did the day before. Car sensors are very similar but massively more important and vulnerable.
Car sensors are close to the ground, have grime and mud slung on them, get rained on, iced over and put through extreme heat and hours of direct sunlight, yet they need to operate flawlessly.
There is a ton of research going on to try to figure out the best ways to preserve these sensors and make cars as safe as possible. For the types of sensors that are already in wide use, a good place to begin understanding the complexity of the problem of protecting these systems is to look at the coatings applied to the lenses of the sensors.
If a sensor is going to stay clean it either needs to repel dirt or to self clean. The vehicle operator is not expected to do anything other than turn a key or push a button and go. There is no expectation that a driver will be cleaning off sensor lenses, especially not if sensors are numerous and in difficult to reach places (i.e. under or behind the grille).
To learn more how your coatings are adhering and interacting with moisture the way you need them to, download our eBook: The Manufacturer’s Roadmap to Eliminate Adhesion Issues in Production
Sensors commonly have small plastic housings that are mounted to the vehicle with the camera or radar component protected by a transparent lens. This lens is the sensor’s first line of defense against the elements. One of the best ways to make sure these lenses are properly guarding the sensitive equipment behind them is to apply a coating to them that is designed to remove disruptive particles that will inevitably land on the lens. These “self-cleaning” coatings are crucial to the life and performance of these sensors.
Self-cleaning coatings come in two varieties and serve very distinct yet equally important functions. There are hydrophobic coatings and hydrophilic coatings, and which one you choose is based on how you want the water and moisture to interact with the surface of the lens and remove the dirt and dust.
Hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity refer to the way liquids behave when they come in contact with a surface. Water will spread out and “wet” a surface that is hydrophilic. If glass isn't perfectly clean, water “beads up” on the surface as it dries, and dirt and minerals that were dissolved in the water appear as water spots.
However, if the glass is clean, the water runs off in sheets. As water dries on clean glass, it remains spread out, and any dirt or minerals are left as a thin, uniform (and invisible) film that doesn't interfere with the ability to see through the glass. Hydrophilic sensor coatings function in the same way: water tends to run off in sheets, taking a majority of the dirt and dust with it. The thin, uniform film of water that remains and evaporates is spread out and doesn't leave behind water spots to obstruct the sensor’s ability to image its surroundings.
A hydrophobic coating does the exact opposite of a hydrophilic coating. These coatings effectively repel water, causing the water to bead up and roll off the surface. These balls of water pick up dirt and dust particles as they roll along, carrying them right off the lens surface. Because of this, hydrophobic coatings are self-cleaning and can be very effective at maintaining a pristine lens. These are much more commonly used on the exterior of lenses than hydrophilic coatings.
When these coatings are being applied during the manufacturing process, tests need to be conducted to ensure that the coating is properly water-resistant and evenly coated. A simple water contact angle measurement is the perfect metric for manufacturers to understand these important characteristics of their coatings. Contact angle measurement devices, like the Surface Analyst, deposit a drop of water on a surface and measure the extent to which that droplet wets out (indicating hydrophilicity) or beads up (indicating hydrophobicity).
A high contact angle correlates to a surface that repels water and has a low amount of what is called surface energy. Contact angles are highly sensitive to minute changes in surface energy so it’s easy to know if a coating is actually sufficiently hydrophobic. This process control method is also useful for measuring how clean the lens surface is before applying the coating to ensure it will create a firm, reliable bond with the lens material. When a coating isn’t able to bond properly or uniformly, it can delaminate which makes it very hard for it to do its job of protecting the lens from dirt.
To keep sensors out of reach of anything that might be able to weaken their ability to sense what’s going on around them, the housings they live in need to be hermetically sealed. This means no vapor of any kind can get in. Clean, dry air needs to be captured behind the lens when it is applied to the housing and the seal must prevent any gas exchange with the outside environment.
If these seals are created through adhesive bonding then the materials to be bonded will go through a treatment process, frequently with plasma, to create a high energy surface. When a surface has high energy, it will have a low contact angle measurement and the surface will be very reactive and eager to bond. When the adhesive is applied to the lens and housing it will form strong bonds with the chemically reactive surfaces to ensure that the sensor is completely enclosed.
One of the reasons a reliable seal is so important is because these sensors are essentially in the splash zone. If mud gets splashed onto your sensor it can render it completely useless. Many car manufacturers are coming up with creative ways to rinse off sensors using cleaning fluid jets focused at the lenses that work similarly to windshield wiper fluid. But if the sensors are getting bombarded with grime, water and cleaning solution all day, the seal has to hold strong through it all.
But what happens if something creeps through?
Anti-glare coatings and anti-fog coatings on the interior of lenses are used to protect the sensor’s ability to see clearly even if the housing seal allows moisture inside.
When moisture condenses on the inside of a lens that is hydrophobic, it beads up into tiny droplets that scatter light: we call this”'fogging up”. Anti-fog coatings create a high energy (hydrophilic) surface on the inside of the lens which allows water to spread out and not bead up; the lens may have a thin film of condensed water on it, but it remains clear. However, the high surface energy of anti-fog coatings presents its own problem.
High energy surfaces are extremely reactive and will tightly adsorb all sorts of contaminants and soils. This surface (like dirty glass) will no longer sheet off water the way it needs to. So typical hydrophilic coatings used for anti fogging can have a relatively short lifespan.
To overcome this conundrum, manufacturers of the coatings will include a tiny bit of surfactant in the coating. When moisture condenses on the lens, it will dissolve some of the surfactant which lowers the surface tension of the water and allow it to spread. So this approach focuses on lowering the surface tension of the liquid. When the water that absorbed the surfactant evaporates, it leaves the surfactant behind to fight another day.
So, these lenses need to be anti-fogging and long-lasting, and it's important to have quantitative tests to ensure the coatings are acting properly: that the surfactant built into the coating is, in fact, migrating out of the bulk of the coating in sufficient quantity to ensure that the surface tension of the liquid is reduced and the liquid spreads out and the sensor chugs along undeterred. A great way to measure the effectiveness of these coatings is by using the “dynamic wetting” feature of the Surface Analyst, which quantifies the presence and activity of surfactant on a surface.
In the gif above you can see how the water continues to spread out on the surface that has a surfactant present. In some instances, manufacturers need to be certain their surfaces are free of surfactant (such as an FIPG sealing application) but, in the case of sensor coatings, sometimes the presence of a surfactant is exactly what’s called for. Manufacturers equipped with technology that accurately measures the existence of all kinds of substances on their surfaces have a clearer view of the potential for failure or success of each assembly.
To learn more about how to be absolutely sure your bonds are strong, your coatings are adhering and interacting with moisture the way you need them to, download our eBook about solving some of the most common problems manufacturers face. Our roadmap is your guide to getting from frustration to revelation, because when you have your “aha!” moment and discover the key to controlling your adhesion process, you’ll be able to optimize production in a whole new way. Download today, The Manufacturer’s Roadmap to Eliminate Adhesion Issues in Production