Various industries have different names for ways they change material surfaces during a production process. In medical fields and other industries dealing with high-reliability polymers they’ll refer to the treatment of materials. In automotive and machining sectors the word used is often cleaning. Other manufacturers that might be applying coatings to surfaces or otherwise altering the surface of a material in a way that isn’t obviously cleaning it can refer to their process as surface preparation.
Whatever you call it, these aspects of manufacturing processes can easily go unmonitored and uncontrolled. Not establishing and maintaining a data-driven specification that considers all the ways material surfaces are altered in an effort to create successful adhesion, leaves the entire process vulnerable to producing low quality product.
This specification ideally is set before the production line is even setup as a way to mitigate risk up front. That isn’t always reality and creating a specification after the fact can be a lengthy and costly process to re-engineer. But here are a few steps to take that, if fully considered and followed, will put manufacturers on the path to a deeper level of process control.
There are two phases in the creation and implementation of a surface quality specification. The first is aimed at figuring out what the ideal state and condition of your material surface is for successful adhesion and how to achieve that surface state; the second is centered on optimizing the manufacturing line to ensure this spec is met.
At the beginning it is necessary to look ahead. What is the baseline performance requirement for the application? If you are bonding, coating, printing, painting or sealing you need to know precisely what that application will ideally accomplish. For instance, print on a plastic bottle that can withstand 5,000 dishwasher cycles, a gasket seal on an engine block that never fails, or an electronic component pcb coating that doesn’t delaminate after a set number of hours of use in a given environment. Once this goal is established, usually by a product design team, then everything else can operate in service of this objective.
Depending upon the application and material (polymers, carbon fiber composite, aluminum, etc.) there are a variety of surface treatment and cleaning techniques and equipment available. Most are engineered to cater to needs of particular materials so choosing the right one will depend a lot on industry standards for surface preparation, activation, cleaning and passivation.
Common methods of surface preparation include plasma treatments, ultrasonic aqueous baths, chemical etching, laser ablation, hand abrading and many, many others. All of these have benefits, but keeping in mind that some have a much narrower applicability than others is very important to choosing the correct surface preparation for your adhesion process.
Beyond considering just what equipment to implement, it is critical that these treatments are seen as directly related to the adhesion goal. When testing these methods, the results need to be scrutinized as to how they affect the ultimate bond performance. Manufacturers need to always be checking against the ideal end product and rejecting what doesn’t meet that goal. Often, in order to get the best results, combinations of these methods are necessary. Setting up the process with the correct combination of treatment steps in the most optimal order is critical.
Keep in mind that changes to the material surfaces are occurring every time they are interacted with. It is necessary to understand what is happening on the surface when these changes occur and how they affect the bond performance. Recognizing the impact of adhesion science will allow for more careful and efficient narrowing of the variables, bringing you closer and closer to the spec you’re looking for.
A deep understanding of the connection between surface treatment and adhesion performance allow you to adjust the parameters of your methods and equipment thoughtfully and with precision. Being able to act with nuance means manufacturers can optimize the surface preparation process without overshooting the ideal and then having to backtrack.
Doing the work of setting the treatment and preparation standards and parameters to produce surfaces that are the most favorable to successful adhesion as outlined in step one before the production process is fully established eliminates hours of excessive rework and costly trial and error.
Once the surface preparations methods have been chosen and the parameters set using a reference material (something not actually going through the real production process but just used to help create the spec), it is time to look at the incoming material.
Material surfaces can vary widely when they arrive at a production facility even if it is the same material from the same supplier. Manufacturers usually have no control over how long a material has been in storage before it enters their facility which can drastically affect the state of the surface by the time it is going to be used in production. There are also times when a supplier will alter the material in a way that they do not deem necessary to mention to a manufacturer because they are unaware that this change could affect adhesion.
Creating a baseline standard for incoming surfaces means that the parameters set downstream in the production process will be interacting with consistent surfaces on each part, roll of material or component. It is important to have a base level threshold for everything that falls below a certain standard is automatically rejected. Setting that threshold helps control the affect the incoming material has on all the ensuing process steps.
Once the specification has been established, the standards need to be upheld. Unfortunately, it is too late if you wait until the end of the production process to see if the adhesion process has been successful. There are ways that treatment, cleaning and preparation methods degrade or drift out of the hard-won spec. This might be due to solution in a cleaning bath needing to be changed, the closeness of the nozzle of a plasma treatment system being moved, a minute wrinkle in a roll of film passing through a corona treatment system, or ever just user error somewhere along the way.
Maintaining the integrity of the parameters and standards put in place is crucial to preserving material surface quality. This can only be accomplished by monitoring the process and responding when a surface is not in spec.
To gain more insight into the ways you can set up a surface quality specification for your manufacturing process reach out to us.
Contact BTG Labs’ Process Experts about how to locate and validate the Critical Control Points in your manufacturing process. A free Production Line Process Walk is available to start the gaining insight into where adhesion failure is originating. You don’t need to tackle the problem alone. To learn more about eliminating adhesion issues, please download the free eBook titled "Manufacturer's Roadmap to Eliminating Adhesion Issues in Production."